Repair specific weak points
Use when the platform and core structure work, but copy, calls to action, forms, metadata or performance need focused changes.
A full rebuild is not the default answer to an old-looking website. Inventory the useful content, URLs, customer paths and technical constraints before choosing the intervention.
Use when the platform and core structure work, but copy, calls to action, forms, metadata or performance need focused changes.
Use when the offer and pages have value, but navigation, visual hierarchy and mobile presentation make them difficult to use.
Use when the platform cannot safely support required performance, maintenance, content workflows or integrations.
List indexable pages, external links, search impressions, high-value content, contact routes, integrations and owned accounts. A page with plain design can still carry search or referral value.
Record the current URL for every page that will move. Retain it where possible. Where change is necessary, map it once to the closest useful destination and update internal links, canonicals and the sitemap.
Capture a baseline for the outcomes that matter. Without a baseline, a prettier launch cannot demonstrate that visibility, speed or enquiries improved.
Define what a visitor must understand or complete and which pages carry that task.
Separate content, interface, technical and operational problems rather than grouping everything under 'old website'.
Preserve useful assets and test the agreed change against the original task after launch.
No. A redesign can retain valuable content and URLs, while focused improvements may solve a narrower problem with less migration risk.
When the current foundation cannot responsibly support security, maintenance, rendering, performance or required functions after realistic repair options are assessed.
Share the URL, goal and known constraints. VURM will not assume a complete rebuild before reviewing the existing foundation.
Discuss the right interventionwe aim to reply within one working day